|
Academic Due
Process Procedures:
The purpose of the following procedure
is to provide students with a system by which to grieve complaints
of alleged academic injustice(s) relating to a final grade and/or
professional responsibilities. Students should have
protection through orderly procedures against unsubstantiated
academic evaluation. Students who believe that their final
course grade reflects unsubstantiated academic evaluation may
initiate and pursue a grade change appeal in accordance with
provisions of this document. At the same time, all academic
rights and privileges of faculty members are to be honored in this
process, which includes careful review
of the course syllabus. Changes in final course grades will
occur only when, as a result of this grade appeal process, there is
clear evidence of unsubstantiated academic evaluation.
Since the grade process involves the
instructor’s judgment of the academic performance of a
student the only issue under consideration in the grade appeal
process is whether or not the student can present clear evidence
that the assignment of the grade was based on factors other than
the academic judgment of the instructor. |
|
| Some examples of the
basis for a legitimate disagreement could include, but not be
limited to prejudiced, capricious, or unsubstantiated academic
evaluation by the instructor: |
- The instructor did not inform the
student of the basis for calculation of grades.
- The instructor did not calculate
the student’s grade in accordance with the instructor’s
stated policy for calculating grades. Significant and
unwarranted deviation from grading procedures and course outlines
set at the beginning of the course (ordinarily during the first
week of the course) or a grade assigned arbitrarily and
capriciously on the basis of whim, impulse or caprice.
* A student may not claim
arbitrariness and capriciousness if he/she disagrees with the
subjective professional evaluation of the instructor.
- There is an error in the
computation of the grade that was not corrected.
- The student, through no fault of
his or her own, was not provided with the same opportunity to
complete the requirements for the course in terms, for example, of
time, access to materials, or access to the instructor as the other
students.
|
|
The following steps must be
followed in the appeals procedure:
|
Informal
Procedure:
-
The student must discuss the final
course grade, grading practices and assignments with the instructor
who gave the final grade. This discussion may eliminate any
misunderstandings over the assignment of the grade as relates to the course syllabus. This discussion
must occur no later than 10 days after the beginning of the
semester (not summer) following the issuance of the final
grade.
-
If the faculty member finds in the
student’s favor, a grade change card is submitted with
signatures and the appeal process is resolved.
|
| If a student and
instructor fail to resolve the grade dispute through informal means
the student may request a formal grade appeal process by completing
a “Final Grade Appeal Form” (see
attached). |
|
| Formal
Procedure: |
| Step One –
Instructor
The
student must complete and submit the “student”
portion of the Final Grade Appeal Form to the course
instructor no later than 21 days after the beginning of the
semester following the issuance of the final grade. The
summer term does not constitute a semester.
-
If the instructor decides that the
final grade is correct, he/she must complete the
“instructor” portion of the Final Grade Appeal
Form, and return it to the student and send a copy to the
chairperson (or substitute) within 14 days of receipt of the
student’s appeal.
If a
faculty member whose grade(s) are being appealed is no longer
employed by the university or is unavailable due to a sabbatical,
sick leave, or other reasons during the time period allotted for
the appeal process, the appeal should be directed to the chair of
the department’s evaluation committee for review.
Step Two – Department Chairperson
If the student wishes to appeal
further, he/she must submit the original Final Grade Appeal Form
(or copy if the instructor fails to respond as described in step 1
above) to the department chairperson (or substitute). This
appeal must be submitted within 14 days of the dated
instructor’s response, or if the instructor does not respond,
within 28 days after the appeal was originally filed with
the instructor. A copy of the Final Grade Appeal Form must be
forwarded to the college dean.
- Before the department chairperson
(or substitute) determines if the student’s complaint
provides evidence that the instructor’s assignment of the
grade was based on factors other than the academic judgment of the
instructor he/she will review the appeal with the
instructor.
-
If the department chairperson (or
substitute) determines the student’s evidence does notmeet the criteria for
a grade appeal, the chairperson (or substitute) will forward
his/her decision on the grade appeal to the college
dean.
-
A copy of the Final Grade Appeal
Form must be forwarded to the student and the
instructor.
-
If the department chairperson (or
substitute) determines the student’s evidence does meet the criteria for a
grade appeal, he/she will recommend in writing to the instructor a
course of action to amend the grade.
* The instructor must indicate on the Final Grade Appeal
Formwhether he/she agrees or disagrees with the chairperson’s
recommendation, signs and returns the Final Grade Appeal
Form to the chairperson within 7 days.
-
If the instructor amends the grade,
a signed grade change card is submitted and the grade appeal is
ended.
-
If the instructor does not agree to
amend the grade or fails to respond in the allotted time, the
chairperson (or substitute) submits the Final Grade Appeal Form to
the college dean with his/her recommendation within 7
days. A copy of the recommendation must be forwarded to
the student and the instructor.
- The chairperson (or substitute) may
also conduct whatever informal investigation seems necessary and
should attempt to achieve a negotiated settlement.
|
Step Three –
Dean
- If the dean, upon review of the chairperson’s
recommendation, also determines the student’s
evidence does not meet
the criteria for a grade appeal, the dean will complete and return
the Grade Appeal Form to the student with a copy to the instructor
and chairperson (or substitute) within 7 days. The grade
appeal process ends.
- If the dean, upon review of the chairperson’s
recommendation, determines that the student’s evidence
does meet
the criteria for a grade appeal, the
dean shall initiate a meeting with the faculty
member. The dean shall review the appeal, can hear evidence
by each side, and may collect further evidence as
desirable.
- If agreement cannot be reached, the
dean will forward the Final
Grade Appeal Form to the Provost
within 7 days, with his/her recommendation that the grade
appeal be referred to a Grade Appeal Board. A copy of the
Final Grade Appeal Form must be forwarded to the student,
instructor, and chairperson.
|
| In each of the above statements,
the chairperson of the department evaluation committee shall
substitute for the department chairperson IF the department
chairperson was the instructor of the course in which the grade is
being appealed. Should the chair of the evaluation committee
not be available, APSCUF will be consulted in the process in
choosing the substitution. |
|
Composition of Grade
Appeal Boar
- Three (3) faculty recommended by
APSCUF. One from the academic department in which the course is
taught. Not the instructor.
- Two (2) managers selected by the
provost. One to be the dean of the college in which the course was
taught.
- One (1) student recommended by Student Government Association.
A senior major in the department in which the course is
taught.
- Normally, each Grade Appeal Board
will be appointed to hear one appeal.
- Those responsible for recommending
board members should be sensitive to race and gender
composition.
- The Provost will appoint each board and
chairperson within the parameters above.
|
|
| Grade Appeal Board
Procedures
Each Grade Appeal Board
is to determine its procedures for hearing the grade appeal.
Normally, both the student and the instructor will be given an
opportunity to state his/her case before the board.
Students who appeal a grade to a Grade Appeal Board are responsible
for maintaining ALL written materials relevant to the appeal, such
as papers, examinations, and completed assignments. Further, the
appeals board must have access to appropriate documentation and
academic records pertaining to the course grade in question.
After the appeals process is complete, the only record to be
maintained will be the student’s final grade.
Each appeals board will make its recommendation to the university
president, who may accept or reject the recommendation.
Since the university president has the power and duty to direct the
activities of the institution, nothing in this policy should be
construed as to diminish that authority in any way.
|
|
| Approved at Meet and Discuss - October 6,
2006
|
|